Spinlab Studio loses Anjouan license after one-code, many-sites claims

According to posts circulating on X, Spinlab Studio, a white-label casino provider, ran the infrastructure behind more than a dozen gambling sites off a single Anjouan license, number ALSI-202606032-FI1, and stamped that same number into the footer of each one. The catch, per the account that surfaced the claims, is that none of those individual platforms actually appeared in Anjouan’s own license registry under that number. Asked directly why specific sites were missing from the listing, Spinlab representatives reportedly said the entries would be added later.

They weren’t, according to the same source. The license got pulled on August 26, and shortly after that the sites tied to it started scrubbing references to the Anjouan license from their own pages — which, if accurate, suggests those operators knew the license backing them no longer existed and moved to clean up before anyone asked questions.

The list attached to ALSI-202606032-FI1 runs at least 16 sites deep: Hell Casino, WTF Games, Spinna, Caeser, Spinerino, Rbet, 247 Casino 247, Treechunk, Moscow Casino, Spintroll, Alldayplay, The Royale Spins, Plan-Z, Casino du Puerto, Sloogs, and Slotlobster. The same posts mention additional properties under Spinlab Studio’s management beyond that list, though a complete accounting hasn’t been published anywhere.

None of this carries an official confirmation yet. Neither Spinlab Studio nor Anjouan’s regulator has addressed the claims, the revocation, or why one license number was apparently covering a stack of platforms absent from the registry themselves. What’s out there is a detailed account from an X thread and not much else — worth taking seriously given the specificity, but still one source, still unverified by the parties actually able to confirm or deny it.

Anjouan’s reputation problem predates this case and is largely built on situations like it — the jurisdiction issues licenses faster and cheaper than Malta or Curaçao, which is exactly why white-label providers gravitate there. If the claims hold up, it’s one more example of a license number working as decoration rather than actual coverage.